2024 IP & Social Justice CLE Recap

“IIPSJ’s annual conferences played an important role in developing a social justice perspective in intellectual property law and policy. The Institute’s mission is a vital one”- Honorable Raymond T. Chen

 

For the 21st Annual IP and Social Justice CLE Program, key attendee sessions included our Annual IP Year in Review, Social Justice Luncheon Plenary Sessions: Increasing Diversity in Innovation and HUSL-ing In-house at JPMC, as well as the Annual Donald R. Dunner Judicial Panel, which included insights and reflections from the Honorable Leonard P. Stark, Judge with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the Honorable Patricia Tolliver Giles, Judge with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the Honorable Scott R. Boalick, Chief Administrative Patent Judge with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and the Honorable Susan G. Braden, Former Chief Judge (ret.) with the United States Court of Federal Claims.

The IP and Social Justice CLE Conference benefits from participation from all demographics within the IP legal community: attorneys in private practice, in-house counsel corporate departments, government agencies, and public interest NGOs, as well as members of the judiciary and government officials.

The IP and Social Justice CLE Program was co-hosted by law firm Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP, with Finnegan Partner & Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer Esther H. Lim being presented with the IP Social Justice Lifetime Achievement Award.

The 2024 CLE sessions were:

  • Key Highlights of 2023: Patent, Trademark, and Copyright
  • Donald R. Dunner Judicial Panel
  • Increasing Diversity in Innovation
  • HUSL-ing In-house at JPMC
  • Inclusive Innovation and Cutting-Edge IP Strategies
  • How to Help the Trial Court Judge Understand Patent Law
  • Embracing the Future of AI, Cybersecurity, and Privacy
  • Updates on College Athletes’ NIL & Celebrities’ Right of Publicity
  • Ethics

View the IP and Social Justice CLE session videos here.

 

Howard University School of Law alumni and professors at the 2024 IP and Social Justice CLE program

 

Thank you to our sponsors!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Blog Post: WRKE Fellow Project Update

Wikimedia Race and Knowledge Equity (WRKE) Fellow Project Update


Kainen Bell, PhD Candidate at the University of Illinois – Urbana Champaign, and 2023/2024 WRKE Wikimedia Foundation Fellow, recently completed the 2024 Summer Global Policy Fellowship at the Institute for Technology and Society (ITS) in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil. He was one of ten researchers selected worldwide who share common interests in technology and its interfaces with law, and who want to expand their knowledge about the Brazilian technological context.

The intensive four-week program took place in July, and included a series of meetings with ITS partners in Rio de Janeiro, Brasília, and São Paulo including the Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation, Brazil’s National Data Protection Agency, NuBank, The Center for Security and Citizenship Studies (CESeC), and others concerned with AI Development and Regulation in Brazil. Bell also presented a lecture titled, “AI Ethics: Regulating Facial Recognition in Brazil” at the International School of Law and Technology offered by ITS in partnership with the University of Montréal.

Bell will remain in Brazil conducting his dissertation research which uncovers algorithmic biases and follows the work of digital rights activists and organizers of anti-surveillance campaigns in Brazil who protest facial recognition camera initiatives. His goal is to learn how Afro-Brazilian communities collaborate to resist and prevent the abuse of surveillance technologies in their neighborhoods.

The findings from his dissertation fieldwork and ITS Global Policy Fellowship contribute towards his WRKE fellowship project, which is to dedicate time into creating resources, documents, and publications to support the efforts of the national anti-surveillance campaign in Brazil.

 

(Kainen Bell on the far right with other ITS Global Policy Fellows outside of the National Soccer Stadium in Brasília, Brazil)


Blog Post: IIPSJ Attendance at the 65th World Intellectual Property Organization General Assemblies

(WIPO GA) (Geneva, 9-17 July 2024)

By Dr. Metka Potočnik (she/her/hers), Senior Lecturer in Law, Wolverhampton Law School

IIPSJ attended the 65th World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) General Assemblies (GA),
in their capacity as the WIPO Accredited Observer. Now attending regularly, IIPSJ participated in the
official hearings at the WIPO Headquarters in Geneva, with the Associate Director for International
Programs, Dr. Metka Potočnik, attending the length of the proceedings in person. These
assemblies brought together another record number of delegates. A full list of participants is
available here, and all the sessions are available for viewing here.

IIPSJ attended the GA sessions for the second time in Geneva, after having observed several WIPO
meetings online, since 2020. IIPSJ continues to take the GA meetings as an opportunity to build
strategic partnerships with Member States and other stakeholders, interested in creating access,
inclusion and empowerment for under-represented creators and innovators in the global eco-
system. IIPSJ contributed to the discussion in writing (see here), and in the session (view here, at
02:31:12).

IIPSJ representative, Dr. Metka Potočnik, also attended the 11th WIPO-NGO Stakeholder Dialogue,
which was organised in parallel with the 65 th WIPO GA and took place on Thursday, 11 July 2024, at the WIPO New Building. WIPO Director General Tang, Deputy Director Edward Kwaka and other WIPO experts met with over sixty Accredited Observers and NGOs, in discussing global challenges, which require a multi-stakeholder response. IIPSJ sent their question in advance, and continued informal conversations with WIPO and several interested stakeholders for the duration of the GA meetings. The event has been placed in the spotlight for its importance, and more can be read here.

IIPSJ is continues to contribute to future discussions in WIPO, with the aim of building a more inclusive WIPO eco-system. The IIPSJ team are working towards a meaningful participation in the 46th Session of the Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCRR) (see here, 2025 dates to be confirmed) and the 33rd Session of the Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP) (see here). If you are interested in contributing to IIPSJ work in this space, do contact the IIPSJ directly.

 

Dr. Metka Potočnik, IIPSJ Associate Director for International Programs, Representing IIPSJ at the Opening of the 65th WIPO GA, Tuesday, 9 July 2024, WIPO, Geneva, Switzerland.

65th WIPO GA, Plenary Session, Tuesday, 9 July 2024.

 

65th WIPO GA, Chair, Director General, WIPO Secretariat, Tuesday, 9 July 2024.

 

WIPO-NGO Stakeholder Dialogue, at the 65th WIPO GA, Thursday, 11 July 2024. WIPO Director General Tang addressing the WIPO NGOs and Accredited Observers, Dr. Metka Potočnik in attendance, representing the IIPSJ.


Blog Post: IIPSJ Oral Statement to WIPO

IIPSJ Oral Statement to the 65th World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) General Assemblies (GA)

July 9-17, 2024

Honorable Chair, Director General, distinguished Delegates, thank you for the floor.

Institute for IP and Social Justice stresses that IP systems must balance economic and
social aims equally, in a manner that offers access, inclusion, and empowerment for all.

WIPO’s IP Gender Action Plan should include initiatives designed to also address
intersectional discrimination and misogyny in the creative and innovative ecosystems. We
stress the need to move away from projects that prioritize only “getting more women into the
system.” Intersectional discrimination and misogyny are systemic barriers that must be
corrected. IP laws must form part of the solution.

Efforts to address intersectional discrimination must also be at the heart of data collection
projects. More should be done to develop methodologies for non-registrable IP rights
(mainly, copyright); and methodologies beyond the mere binary counting of genders, so that
we also include gender-diverse people.

For more, please see our written statement.

Prepared by Dr. Metka Potočnik
IIPSJ Associate Director for International Programs


Blog Post: The National Strategy for Inclusive Innovation - A Framework for IP Social Justice

The National Strategy for Inclusive Innovation: A Framework for IP Social Justice


On May 1, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office announced the adoption of the National Strategy for Inclusive Innovation (NSII). The NSII was developed by the USPTO with support from the Council for Inclusive Innovation (CI2), and “is based on a vision for United States leadership in innovation that will lift communities, grow the economy, create quality jobs, and address global challenges.” The USPTO intends to accomplish the vision set forth in the NSII by increasing participation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and innovation, both generally and through related entrepreneurship, and thereby “unleash every American’s ability to fully take part in the innovation economy.”

The NSII embodies a bold initiative through which to pursue the mandate of the Unleashing American Innovators Act, signed into law by President Biden on December 29, 2022, and to achieve the social justice obligations and effects integral to an effective intellectual property ecosystem. While promoting IP endeavor has been at the forefront of American advances in science and technology since our nation’s inception, as noted in the NSII, leading research reveals that participation in the American innovation ecosystem is “exceptionally unequal”. A recent report by the USPTO indicates that only 12.8% of all inventors named on U.S. patents are women, while a Harvard study revealed that White Americans are three times more likely to become inventors than Black Americans, and that the children of the top 1% of income earners are 10 times more likely to become inventors than children with family incomes below the median.

The NSII represents a targeted, comprehensive strategy for ensuring that all Americans enjoy meaningful opportunities for access to, inclusion in, and empowerment through the IP and innovation ecosystem. The NSII is structured around four “cornerstone” goals, each addressing “a critical inflection point in the lives of potential innovators”: (i) Inspiring New Generations of Innovators; (ii) Educating and Empowering Innovators; (iii) Advancing Inclusive Innovation; and (iv) Bringing Innovation to Market. Based upon these cornerstone goals, the NSII includes a range of specific policy recommendations, from enhancing efforts to standardize and scale youth innovation education to expanding initiatives through which to leverage and increase commercialization support and tech transfer to benefit all American communities.

Through the NSII, the USPTO takes a leadership role in meeting the great challenge of confronting the demographic, economic, and geographic under-representation of citizens in the innovation economy. Every American must enjoy the opportunity and the privilege to contribute to the innovation storehouse, and to achieve this the NSII seeks to address every underserved cohort, including rural regions, veterans, elder communities, persons with disabilities, those who have educated themselves in non-elite or non-traditional settings, including trade schools, community colleges, or work experiences, as well as those who are under-resourced. To cultivate our nation’s full potential, “the United States must make sustained investments in its most important asset—the American people—by ensuring that every individual—irrespective…of ethnicity, gender, disability, or location—has access to the resources and opportunities to innovate.”

IIPSJ commends the National Strategy for Inclusive Innovation and its social justice-oriented perspective towards the American innovation ecosystem. We hope you will review the full report at https://www.uspto.gov/initiatives/equity/national-strategy-inclusive-innovation.

 


Press Release: Institute for Intellectual Property and Social Justice Expands Board, Goals

Press Release: Institute for Intellectual Property and Social Justice Expands Board, Goals


The Institute for Intellectual Property and Social Justice, a twenty-one year old organization founded by Howard University law professor, Lateef Mtima, has expanded its board to include twelve thought leaders in IP legal practice and policy. The expansion will facilitate IIPSJ’s ability to focus nationally on its goal of promoting social justice through the most valuable property currently in existence: intellectual property.

“IIPSJ has been able to accomplish quite a bit from a modest beginning,” said Mtima. “It has helped to foster a more socially responsible and inclusive conversation about the role of IP protection in our society. Through the capabilities and insights of this very distinguished board IIPSJ will be able to build significantly upon these accomplishments.”

The expanded board will be chaired by Idris Mckelvey, Lead Patent Counsel at the Estée Lauder Companies Inc, and an alumnus of Howard University School of Law (2005). Its new members include:

Jeremiah Chan, Esq., Associate General Counsel – Meta Platforms
Joseph Drayton, Esq., Partner – Proskauer Rose LLP
Izu Emeagwalli, Esq., Executive Director and Assistant General Counsel – J.P. Morgan
Oliver St. Clair Franklin CBE, Honorary British Consul for Greater Philadelphia
Jonathan Goins, Esq., Principal – Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
Philip Hampton, Esq., Partner – Polsinelli P.C.
Suzanne Harrison, Principal – Percipience LLC
Tom Irving, Esq., Partner – The Marbury Law Group, PLLC
Esther Lim, Esq., Partner – Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Lita Rosario-Richardson, Esq., Shareholder, Chair Entertainment Law Group – Shulman Rogers, P.A.
Tony Sebro, Esq., General Counsel – Change.org
Karyn Temple, Esq., Senior Executive Vice President and Global General Counsel – Motion Picture Association

“We are looking forward to our first expanded board meeting on April 4,” said Mckelvey. “The recruitment process generated a lot of enthusiasm for using this tool, intellectual property, which is not often associated with social justice, to create a more just and prosperous society.”

 


mosaic ip conference purple banner

Mosaic 2023 Event Recap

On October 27-28, 2023, IIPSJ, along with University of Illinois Chicago Law, hosted the 9th Annual IP Mosaic Conference with the theme IP Rights and Wrongs: Advancing Social Justice and Ethics.

During the conference, attendees were able to listen to two plenary panel presentations which are saved on our Youtube page. The presentations were:

International IP and Climate Change

Moderator: Metka Potočnik, Senior Lecturer in Law, University of Wolverhampton, Law School and Director of The F-List for Music CIC

 

Panelists:

  • Peter Oksen, World Intellectual Property Organization, Global Challenges Division
  • Antony Taubman, World Trade Organization, Intellectual Property Division

 

Copyright Behind Bars: At the Intersection of Systemic Incarceration and IP Social Justice

 

Moderator: John R. Whitman, Ph.D., author, Executive Director, Museum for Black Innovation and Entrepreneurship

Panelists:

  • Jeanie Austin, Ph.D., Librarian, Jail and Reentry Services, San Francisco Public Library
  • Wendy Jason, Founder and Director, Justice Arts Coalition, nonprofit national network for those creating art in and around the criminal justice system (invited)
  • Doran Larson, Ph.D, Professor of Literature, Hamilton College and Founder and Co-Director of the American Prison Writing Archive
  • Viva R. Moffat, Professor of Law, Co-Director, Intellectual Property and Technology Law Program, Sturm College of Law, University of Denver, advocating for IP rights for currently/formerly incarcerated and society
  • Fury Young, Founder and Co-Executive Director, Die Jim Crow, the first nonprofit record label for currently and formerly incarcerated artists

 

In addition, participants were able to present their papers and ideas for papers and receive feedback from attendees on their ideas. These five separate paper presentation panels were:

  • IP & Tech
  • 2023 Ben Liu Scholars
  • The Role of Patent Law: from Technicalities to Social Correctives?
  • IP and Social Action: Ways to Empowerment?
  • Music Creators and Society: System Reboot or Reform to Building Better Partnerships?

We hope you can join us this fall as we celebrate the 10th Annual IP Mosaic Conference at in person and online at Marquette University Law School (dates TBA).


Blog Post: 2023 End of Year Recap

2023 End of Year Recap


As we close another successful year, we want to highlight some of the impact of your contributions for 2023:

The Nexus of Social Justice and Intellectual Property

  • Our monthly newsletters (https://iipsj.org/latest-news/) provided readers with timely and relevant recent developments in intellectual property law that have particular impacts on diverse communities and the concept of social justice, including:
    • The Supreme Court Decision in Gonzalez v. Google (https://iipsj.org/gonzalez-v-google/), which IIPSJ Founder and Director Lateef Mtima noted “implicitly acknowledges the complexity of the issues and interests impacted by Section 230, including the need to preserve venues through which marginalized and vulnerable voices and perspectives can be heard.”
    • The Supreme Court Decision in Warhol v. Goldsmith (https://iipsj.org/warhol-v-goldsmith/), which IIPSJ Founder and Director Lateef Mtima noted “ensures the vitality of the Fair Use doctrine while protecting artists, particularly marginalized and developing artists, from the distortion of the doctrine into a tool for the misappropriation of one artist’s work by another artist with greater fame and public recognition.”
    • Public Knowledge’s paper entitled Streaming in the Dark: Where Music Listeners’ Money Goes – and Doesn’t, which explained how billions in music subscription revenues “trickle up” into the pockets of “Rightsholding Middlemen,” leaving comparatively little for the artists themselves (https://publicknowledge.org/policy/streaming-in-the-dark-where-music-listeners-money-goes-and-doesnt/).
  • Working with our various academic partners, IIPSJ organized the ninth annual IP MOSAIC Conference, where we created a space for IP scholars, political activists, practicing attorneys, community organizers, and policy makers to discuss papers and collaborate on various topics of IP empowerment. (https://iipsj.org/programs/ip-mosaic/) The theme was IP Rights and Wrongs: Advancing Social Justice and Ethics.

Diversifying the Legal Field and the Intellectual Property Bar

  • For two decades, the IIPSJ IP and Social Justice CLE program (https://iipsj.org/2023-ip-social-justice-cle-recap/) has provided a venue through which to showcase minority and women IP attorneys. The 20th Annual IP & Social Justice CLE program (https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpjeDSnL4i4lEMJf0N-48iqiZYF-CBvSb) explored the latest developments in IP law, including the relevant social justice impacts, strategies, and opportunities for enhancing the social efficacy of the IP legal regime.
  • Working with our various academic partners and event sponsors, IIPSJ worked with Charlie Bingham to organize the 5th Annual HBCU IP & Tech Law Summit (https://iipsj.org/programs/hbcu-ip-tech-law-summit/), where the audience was treated to leading technology lawyers discussing Artificial Intelligence, Data Security and Privacy, Tech in Sports & Entertainment, Blockchain, Cybersecurity and more. 
  • In August, IIPSJ participated in the United States Intellectual Property Alliance (USIPA) Increasing Diversity in Innovation (IDII) (https://increasingdii.org/) 2nd Annual Conference, where companies, law firms, universities, the USPTO and the U.S.  Department of Commerce in the came together to discuss increasing diversity in the U.S. innovation ecosystem, and how they are working to transform it. IIPSJ Founder and Director Lateef Mtima shared his insight by speaking in the “What Can Universities Do?” panel. 
  • With the goal of highlighting minority IP attorneys to serve as role models to encourage the pursuit of careers in IP practice, IIPSJ continued our Attorneys of Color in IP interview series (https://iipsj.org/blog-post-ip-attorney-interviews/), which featured interviews with Professor Daryl Lim, and trademark and fashion attorney Mariessa Terrell. 

Advocacy for Participation in the Intellectual Property System

Community Outreach that Empowers Creators of Color to Share, Protect, and Monetize Their Work


Blog Post: IIPSJ Attendance at the 44th WIPO Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR)

IIPSJ Attendance at the 44th World Intellectual Property Organization Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (WIPO SCCR)

Geneva, 6-8 November 2023

 

IIPSJ attended the 44th World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR), in their capacity as the WIPO Accredited Observer. IIPSJ submitted a written statement and attended the official hearings at the WIPO Headquarters in Geneva, with the Associate Director for International Programs, Dr. Metka Potočnik, attending the length of the proceedings in person. These assemblies brought together delegates from Member States in person, and online, and a significant number of observers. A full list of participants is available here, and all the sessions are available for viewing here.

IIPSJ attended the WIPO General Assemblies in July 2023, and at this latest meeting continued to grow strategic partnerships with Member States and other stakeholders, interested in creating access, inclusion and empowerment for under-represented creators and innovators in the global eco-system.  Delegates at the SCCR discussed the two standing issues (broadcasting and limitations and exceptions) and some other matters, such as copyright in the digital environment. Full agenda can be viewed here. On copyright in the digital environment IIPSJ representative offered an oral intervention, highlighting the need to align the work of the SCCR with the work WIPO has done in its Intellectual Property Gender Action Plan, which was adopted in 2023 (see here). Furthermore, Dr. Potočnik stressed that all research and evidence collection from artists and creators must be intersectional, focusing not only on all genders, but also race, class, age, (dis)ability of the creators, inclusive IP systems are meant to protect. The written statement can be viewed here (page 3), and the oral intervention is available here (at 02:41:17).

IIPSJ will contribute to future discussions in WIPO, with the aim of building more inclusive IP systems across different jurisdictions. The IIPSJ team are working towards a meaningful participation in the 31st Session of the Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP) (see here), whilst awaiting the confirmation of the 2024 schedule, where further work will be presented. If you are interested in contributing to IIPSJ work in this space, do contact the IIPSJ directly.

 

Dr. Metka Potočnik, IIPSJ Associate Director for International Programs, Representing IIPSJ at the Opening of the 44th WIPO SCCR, Monday, 6 November 2023, WIPO, Geneva, Switzerland.

 

44th WIPO SCCR, Plenary Session, IIPSJ Requesting the Floor, Wednesday, 8 November 2023.

 

Dr. Metka Potočnik, IIPSJ Associate Director for International Programs, delivering the IIPSJ statement on Agenda #8.1 at the 44th WIPO SCCR, Wednesday, 8 November 2023, WIPO, Geneva, Switzerland.

Blog Post: IIPSJ Written Statement Submitted to WIPO

IIPSJ Written Statement to the 44th Session of the WIPO Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR)

November 6-8, 2023

IIPSJ is a WIPO Accredited Observer, seated in the United States, focused on matters domestically, and internationally. IIPSJ examines intellectual property laws and policies to see where full participation of disadvantaged, excluded, and marginalized groups may need redressing. IP systems should offer access, inclusion, and empowerment for all, not only a select group. At this time, we would like to add a few observations of general nature, to the 44th SCCRR Agenda Item Number 8.1 on the Proposal for Analysis of Copyright Related to the Digital Environment.

The digital environment offers both opportunities, and risks for the creatives, sharing their works online. Effective IP protection and exploitation must be considered against the interests of various groups of stakeholders. There is evidence across jurisdictions, that not all artists, creatives, or musicians, are making comparable income, and that some groups are marginalized by the IP systems. In 2021, the UK Intellectual Property Office conducted a survey, finding that women make from music seven thousand pounds less than men, who on average make twenty thousand pounds a year.i In 2022, a larger sample investigating the earnings by Black artists found, that on average, Black women make twenty-five percent less than white women.ii In 2023, evidence found that Black musicians with disabilities, have fewer opportunities in the sector still.iii

IIPSJ has an extensive network of scholars and sister organizations, who have explored the effects of IP systems on different groups of inventors and creatives, and they agree that the personal characteristics, such as gender(s), race, nationality, age, disability, class (or other), matter when it comes to access and enjoyment of IP systems (an intersectional approach). Making art, as making music, is a social activity, where conditions in which the individuals create, matter. WIPO’s commitment to an inclusive IP regime is demonstrated, among other, by its activities under “Intellectual Property, Gender and Diversity” and its current WIPO IP Gender Action Plan (IP GAP). IP GAP’s vision of gender equality will rely on research “to identify the scope and nature of the gender gap in IP and ways to close the gap”.iv IIPSJ would add to the action plan and stress that firstly, WIPO IP GAP commitments should be implemented in other WIPO Studies, Analysis, and Action Plans, across all Divisions (such as the here discussed Agenda #8.1), and secondly, that this research must be intersectional, to avoid any correctives which could continue to ignore artists, creatives, or musicians, who are currently disadvantaged, excluded and marginalized by the creative industries.

There cannot be a socially just approach towards building an inclusive IP system, if we focus ‘on gender alone,’ or operate under the assumption that the digital space is full of opportunities, equal to all. There is ample research to demonstrate that not all artists or creatives, have equal access or opportunities, to share their innovation and imagination with the world, to the mutual benefit of all in the society.

 

Prepared by Dr. Metka Potočnik
IIPSJ Associate Director for International Programs

 


i Intellectual Property Office, ‘Music creators’ earnings in the digital era’ (2021). Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/music-creators-earnings-in-the-digital-era.

ii Black Lives in Music (BLIM UK), ‘Being Black in the UK Music Industry: Music Creators Part I’ (2021). Available: https://blim.org.uk/report/. For general research on women in UK music: Vick Bain, ‘Counting the Music Industry: the Gender Gap; A study of gender inequality in the UK Music Industry’ (2019). Available: https://vbain.co.uk/research/.

iii Black Lives in Music (BLIM UK), ‘Unseen. Unheard. Race and Disability – Black disabled experience in the UK’s music industry’ (2023). Available: https://blim.org.uk/report-unseen-unheard/.

iv World Intellectual Property Organization, ‘WIPO Intellectual Property (IP) and Gender Action Plan: the Role of IP in Support of Women and Girls’ (2022) 4. Available: https://www.wipo.int/women-and-ip/en/4.