IIPSJ IP and Social Justice Library

IIPSJ is developing an online library of leading articles on the implications of intellectual property on social justice. The library includes articles from IIPSJ's first academic symposium as well as other articles. The library is in its early stages of development, but we anticipate it growing substantially in the coming months and years in number of articles and in sophistication of organization and searching tools. For now it is organized topically with citations and links to pdf versions of the articles.

Copyright

Steven D. Jamar, Copyright and the Public Interest from the Perspective of Brown v. Board of Education, 48 How. L.J. 629 (2005)

Cultural Heritage

Danielle Conway-Jones, Safeguarding Hawaiian Traditional Knowledge and Cultural Heritage:  Supporting the Right to Self-Determination and Preventing the Commodification of Culture, 48 How. L.J. 737 (2005)

R. Hokulei Lindsey, Responsibility and Accountability:  The Birth of a Strategy to Protect Kanaka Maoli Traditional Knowledge, 48 How. L.J. 763 (2005)

General

Steven D. Jamar, Copyright and the Public Interest from the Perspective of Brown v. Board of Education, 48 How. L.J. 629 (2005)

Lateef Mtima, Introduction to the 2005 IIPSJ Symposium, 48 How. L.J. 571 (2005)

Robert H. Wright, Today's Scandal Can Be Tomorrow's Vogue:  Why Section 2(A) of the Lanham Act is Unconstitutionally Void for Vagueness, 48 How. L.J. 659 (2005)

Music

Racquel C. Callender (student author), Harmonizing Interests on the Internet:  Online Users and the Music Industry, 48 How. L.J. 787 (2005)

Patent -- Drugs

Simone A. Rose, On Purple Pills, Stem Cells, and Other Market Failures: A Case for a Limited Compulsory Licensing Scheme for Patent Property, 48 How. L.J. 579 (2005)

Patent -- Equivalence

Kenneth D. Bassinger, Unsettled Expectations in Patent Law:  Festo and the Moving Target of Claim Equivalence, 48 How. L.J. 685 (2005)

Trademark

Robert H. Wright, Today's Scandal Can Be Tomorrow's Vogue:  Why Section 2(A) of the Lanham Act is Unconstitutionally Void for Vagueness, 48 How. L.J. 659 (2005)

 

 

 

last updated March 16, 2008